indiscriminate slaying of over a dozen people in the Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad by USA

June 19th, 2010

Collateral Murder

Overview

5th April 2010 10:44 EST WikiLeaks has released a classified US military video depicting the indiscriminate slaying of over a dozen people in the Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad — including two Reuters news staff.

Reuters has been trying to obtain the video through the Freedom of Information Act, without success since the time of the attack. The video, shot from an Apache helicopter gun-sight, clearly shows the unprovoked slaying of a wounded Reuters employee and his rescuers. Two young children involved in the rescue were also seriously wounded.

Short version

Full version

The military did not reveal how the Reuters staff were killed, and stated that they did not know how the children were injured.

After demands by Reuters, the incident was investigated and the U.S. military concluded that the actions of the soldiers were in accordance with the law of armed conflict and its own “Rules of Engagement”.

Consequently, WikiLeaks has released the classified Rules of Engagement for 2006, 2007 and 2008, revealing these rules before, during, and after the killings.

WikiLeaks has released both the original 38 minutes video and a shorter version with an initial analysis. Subtitles have been added to both versions from the radio transmissions.

WikiLeaks obtained this video as well as supporting documents from a number of military whistleblowers. WikiLeaks goes to great lengths to verify the authenticity of the information it receives. We have analyzed the information about this incident from a variety of source material. We have spoken to witnesses and journalists directly involved in the incident.

WikiLeaks wants to ensure that all the leaked information it receives gets the attention it deserves. In this particular case, some of the people killed were journalists that were simply doing their jobs: putting their lives at risk in order to report on war. Iraq is a very dangerous place for journalists: from 2003- 2009, 139 journalists were killed while doing their work.

‘Discovery’ of Afghan Riches a Pro-war PR Scam?

June 16th, 2010

By Daniel Tencer

July 15, 2010 “RawStory” –  A New York Times report announcing the US has found $1 trillion-worth of mineral deposits in Afghanistan has some observers wondering if the news is part of a public-relations effort to bolster support for the Afghanistan war as the mission’s death toll continues to climb.

An article in Sunday’s New York Times announces that “previously unknown deposits — including huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium — are so big and include so many minerals that are essential to modern industry that Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into one of the most important mining centers in the world, the United States officials believe.”

The article cites an “internal Pentagon memo” as saying Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium” — the mineral used in the production of rechargeable batteries, such as those found in cell phones and laptops. It cites “a small team of Pentagon officials and American geologists” as having made the discovery.

While the dollar estimate — $1 trillion — may be new, it’s hardly news that Afghanistan sits on rich mineral deposits. In a 2007 press release, the US Geological Survey announced that Afghanistan possesses “significant amounts of undiscovered non-fuel mineral resources.” And, as Marc Ambinder reports on his Atlantic blog, the Soviet Union was aware of Afghanistan’s mineral potential as early as 1985.

“The ‘discovery’ of Afghanistan’s minerals will sound pretty silly to old timers,” a “retired former senior US official” tells Politico’s Laura Rosen. “When I was living in Kabul in the early 1970’s the [US government], the Russians, the World Bank, the UN and others were all highly focused on the wide range of Afghan mineral deposits. Cheap ways of moving the ore to ocean ports has always been the limiting factor.”

So why is this news now? To many, the story’s timing suggests a Pentagon public relations campaign designed to extend public support for the war with the hope that, in time, Afghanistan may be able to raise itself out of abject poverty.

“Why the story broke in the NYT on Sunday could be linked to a desire by the Pentagon to create a reason why US troops might want to stick around in Afghanistan for some time to come,” writes Paul Jay at the Huffington Post. “Things are not going very well on the ground and the promise of vast mineral riches would sound enticing.”

Some “veteran Afghan hands detect an echo of [Gen. David] Petraeus’ effort to ‘put a little more time on the Washington clock’ for the Afghanistan surge, as he once described his public relations strategy to buy time in the US for the Iraq surge,” Rosen reports.

Indeed, the US military’s need to shore up support for the war effort may be becoming critical. Recent news reports indicate that Afghan President Hamid Karzai may have lost his faith in the US military’s ability to carry out the war. And Gareth Porter at IPS reports that US forces are facing “the spectre of a collapse of U.S. political support for the war in Afghanistan in coming months comparable to the one that occurred in the Iraq War in late 2006.”

That context leads blogger Steve Hynd to declare that the Times piece is “a conveniently timed zombie story” that was “resurrected yet again for political purposes.”

Even if one were to take the Times story at face value, the practical benefits of Afghanistan’s mineral deposits are in doubt — not least because of the country’s weak central government, corruption and a lack of skilled labor.

“Under even the rosiest scenarios, it does not appear the new wealth will change dynamics quickly enough in Afghanistan to aid the US military effort there,” reports Alan Greenblatt at NPR.

[Daniel] Markey [of the Council on Foreign Relations] says he’s nervous that Afghanistan will fall prey to the “resource curse,” under which nations that base their economies primarily on natural resources fall prey to conflict and corruption — forces that are already endemic in Afghanistan.

“Afghanistan can make a lot of money from this, but this is the way to make money that attracts corruption,” says S. Frederick Starr, chairman of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute at Johns Hopkins University.

“A scramble for Afghanistan’s resources would simply intensify the tribal warfare that’s already taking place in that devastated country,” writes Jacob Heilbrun at the Huffington Post. “The sad truth is that precious natural resources are, more often than not, a curse for the Third World nations that harbor them.”

======

Say What?
Afghanistan Has $1 Trillion in Untapped Mineral Resources?

By Blake Hounshell

July 14, 2010 “Foreign Policy” –  I’ll get to the main point in a little bit, but bear with me for a second … A series of recent news stories has deeply damaged the Obama administration’s case for continued patience with U.S.-led counterinsurgency campaign, which has shown little discernable progress despite the best efforts tens of thousands of additional American troops and an all-star lineup of top military officers.

First, let’s talk about Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president. Remember the chatter earlier this year about how he’d gone crazy, threatening to join the Taliban and all that? That discussion died down a little after Karzai checked all the right boxes during his May visit to Washington.

Then came the “peace jirga” — after which Karzai abruptly fired his intelligence and interior ministers, reputed to be two of the most competent members of his cabinet (technically, they resigned). The intelligence minister, Amrullah Saleh, told his side of the story Friday in a jaw-dropping interview with the Times. According to Saleh, Karzai no longer believes the West can win the war and is looking to cast his lot with Pakistan and the Taliban; an unnamed source told the paper that Karzai had suggested that the Americans had carried out a rocket attack on the peace jirga. Karzai has apparently also asked the United Nations to remove Mullah Omar from a key U.N. blacklist.

Next came revelations that Pakistan’s powerful military intelligence agency, the ISI, is still deeply involved with the Afghan Taliban (yeah, blow me over with a feather) despite heated denials to the contrary.

Meanwhile, the drive for Kandahar looks to be stalled in the face of questionable local support for Karzai’s government, the Taliban is killing local authorities left and right, and the corruption situation has apparently gotten so bad that the U.S. intelligence community is now keeping tabs on which Afghan officials are stealing what.

In short, things don’t look good for the United States … which makes me suspicious of the timing of this attention-grabbing James Risen story in the Times, which opens with this mind-boggling lede:

The United States has discovered nearly $1 trillion in untapped mineral deposits in Afghanistan, far beyond any previously known reserves and enough to fundamentally alter the Afghan economy and perhaps the Afghan war itself, according to senior American government officials.”

Wow! Talk about a game changer. The story goes on to outline Afghanistan’s apparently vast underground resources, which include large copper and iron reserves as well as hitherto undiscovered reserves lithium and other rare minerals.

Read a little more carefully, though, and you realize that there’s less to this scoop than meets the eye. For one thing, the findings on which the story was based are online and have been since 2007, courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey. More information is available on the Afghan mining ministry’s website, including a report by the British Geological Survey (and there’s more here). You can also take a look at the USGS’s documentation of the airborne part of the survey here, including the full set of aerial photographs.

Nowhere have I found that $1 trillion figure mentioned, which Risen suggests was generated by a Pentagon task force seeking to help the Afghan government develop its resources (looking at the chart accompanying the article, though, it appears to be a straightforward tabulation of the total reserve figures for each mineral times current the current market price). According to Risen, that task force has begun prepping the mining ministry to start soliciting bids for mineral rights in the fall.

Don’t get me wrong. This could be a great thing for Afghanistan, which certainly deserves a lucky break after the hell it’s been through over the last three decades.

But I’m (a) skeptical of that $1 trillion figure; (b) skeptical of the timing of this story, given the bad news cycle, and (c) skeptical that Afghanistan can really figure out a way to develop these resources in a useful way. It’s also worth noting, as Risen does, that it will take years to get any of this stuff out of the ground, not to mention enormous capital investment.

Moreover, before we get too excited about lithium and rare-earth metals and all that, Afghanistan could probably use some help with a much simpler resource: cement.

According to an article in the journal Industrial Minerals, “Afghanistan has the lowest cement production in the world at 2kg per capita; in neighbouring Pakistan it is 92kg per capita and in the UK it is 200kg per capita.” Afghanistan’s cement plants were built by a Czech company in the 1950s, and nobody’s invested in them since the 1970s. Most of Afghanistan’s cement is imported today, mainly from Pakistan and Iran. Apparently the mining ministry has been working to set up four new plants, but they are only expected to meet about half the country’s cement needs.

Why do I mention this? One of the smartest uses of development resources is also one of the simplest: building concrete floors. Last year, a team of Berkeley researchers found that “replacing dirt floors with cement appears to be at least as effective for health as nutritional supplements and as helpful for brain development as early childhood development programs.” And guess what concrete’s made of? Hint: it’s not lithium.

UPDATE: Missed this Wall Street Journal story earlier. Money quote:

[T]he Mines Ministry has long been considered among Afghanistan’s most corrupt government departments, and Western officials have repeatedly expressed reservations about the Afghan government awarding concessions for the country’s major mineral deposits, fearful that corrupt officials would hand contracts to bidders who pay the biggest bribes — not who are best suited to actually do the work.

Buzz ItShare

Close

Forgot password?

Send me my password!

Close message

Login

Subscribe to this blog post’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS  Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Follow the discussion

Comments (6)

Loading... Logging you in…
CloseLogin to IntenseDebate

Or create an account

Close WordPress.com

CloseLogin with your OpenID

Or create an account using OpenID


  • Logged in as

Admin Options

Save Settings

Loading comments…

You are about to flag this comment as being inappropriate. Please explain why you are flagging this comment in the text box below and submit your report. The blog admin will be notified. Thank you for your input.

Nick Tucker's avatarNick Tucker · 2 hours ago

Definitely is a pretext to keep their troops in place for as long as they have funds to do so – thus the hook in the hope that dumb dip-shits on “Wailing Wall Street” salivating at the prospect of further filthy lucre from US government junk bonds pour their sacks of gold into the Military Industrial Complex – Lets hope these shylocks get what they deserve in the end – no profit and death.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

THE PALESTINIAN PERSPECTIVE

‘Afghanistan’s Mineral Riches – A Conveniently Timed Zombie Story,’ by Steve Hind, June 14, 2010 – Uruknet.info – http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m67045&hd=&siz…

GOOD NEWS

Afghanistan – it’s not all bad news. For the Aghans, anyway. – ‘Panic Time in Afghanistan,’ by Jim White, June 14, 2010 – Uruknet.info – http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m67037&hd=&siz…

‘IT ALL DEPENDS WHO HAS BEEN HOLDING THE WHIP FOR EIGHT HUNDRED YEARS”

NOAM CHOMSKY

Why the Palestinians have a _much_ clearer view of reality than US mushrooms

Noam Chomsky – “After 911 I had a ton of interviews. Except in the US of course. And in some cases it was Irish and British TV back to back. And the difference was startling. I said this much on Irish TV (hold hands six inches apart) and ok, discussion over. Everyone gets it. But on British TV I had to go on for like about an hour to say the same thing. The Irish Sea is a Chasm (of understanding). It all depends who has been holding the whip for eight hundred years and who has been under it. And the same is true in every other part of the world.” – Noam Chomsky on why some countries, and some groups, ‘get it’ and others have a much harder time. ‘Rebel Without a Pause’ – 911 – Approx @ 52.00 on dvd -

Google video – Noam Chomsky – ‘Rebel without a pause’ – @ 50.00 approx (?) – http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-43667848…

Uruknet.info – http://www.uruknet.info/?p=-6&l=x

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

AFGHANISTAN

EVIL EMPIRES: ONE DOWN, ONE TO GO – CONTD

A _wonderful_ thirty minutes on ‘Democracy Now!’ today – “‘I love the US Republic and I hate the US Empire,’ – Johan Galtung on the war in Afghanistan and how to get out,” – June 15th, 2010 – Democracy Now – http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/15/i_love_the_…

In part 1, on June 7th, 2010, Johan Galtung, Norwegian Peace activist, told us that he expected the US Empire to go the way of the Soviet Empire. By about 2020.

Johan Galtung on “The Fall of the US Empire – Part 1,” by John Galtung. June 7th, 2010 – Democracy Now – http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/7/johan_galtun…

EVIL EMPIRES: ONE DOWN, ONE TO GO

Rember ‘Evil Empires: One down, one to go’ – the smart-ass bumper sticker from Autodesk smart-aleck John Walker, in 1990? – Now you can DIY print your own. – http://www.fourmilab.ch/evilempire/

More under ‘Reply’.

Share/Save/Bookmark

1 reply · active 1 hour ago

EVIL EMPIRES: ONE DOWN, ONE TO GO

Johan Galtung makes a clear distinction between the US Empire which he emphatically rejects for its murderousness, its greed and its endless subjugation of other peoples.

And the US Republic which he supports as endlessly creative, energetic and innovative.

Which doesn’t make sense, but perhaps is a useable-for-US-mushrooms sound-bite. Can we all have a go? How about -

“We tolerate (a fewer by the day) US people. We love some American land / water / forest / meadows / trees and more intelligent (non-human) animals. But you can keep all the bits between the two coasts and most of the people there too. Especially the people from Tea Party Land, where the only virgins are sisters that can run faster than their brothers.”

Just a suggestion.

Johan Galtung specializes in ‘conflict resolution’. It shows.

Those who say that Galtung is ‘anti-American’ miss the point that it is possible to be both anti the US Empire and pro the US Republic, he says.

Others would agree with his point about the end of the US Empire actually greatly aiding the great mass of the US people, if not the tiny number of US plutocrats who derive benefit from it.

Galtung points out that other countries have successfully gone throught the end of their empires. The Spanish did it. The French did it. The Italians did it. (Yes, Cynthia, they actually did have an empire. In north Africa, where they clobbered the Ethiopians and others). Finally and most recently, the British did it. Britain today has never been as wealthy as it is today, he suggests. Which doesn’t quite tell the whole story. But all in a good cause.

TWO OPTIONS

1. Fascism. A US military coup. The option that Gore Vidal sees as most likely.

2. A renaissance in the US, freed from the albatross of Empire around its neck and the staggering cost. The amount spent on the Empire annually – DOD, bases, on and on is equal to the entire receipts of US taxes.

He forecast the end of the Soviet Empire ‘in about ten years,’ in 1980. (He says). True? False? Any proof? Is he an ‘astroturfed’ Re-thuglican talking point to get Liberals hopes up for a week before Rarl Kove dashes them again next week? Who is John Galt? ER, Johan Galtung?

Johan Galtung on “The Fall of the US Empire – Part 1,” by John Galtung. June 7th, 2010 – Democracy Now – http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/7/johan_galtun…

Johan Galtung on “The Fall of the US Empire – Part 2,” by John Galtung. June 15th, 2010 – Democracy Now – http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/15/i_love_the_…

On the coming decline and fall of the US Empire – Short version – 2004 – http://www.transnational.org/SAJT/forum/meet/2004…

“The Fall of the US Empire,” – book, by John Galtung. – Preface and Table of Contents – http://www.transcend.org/tup/books/FallUS.html

EVIL EMPIRES: ONE DOWN, ONE TO GO

Rember ‘Evil Empires: One down, one to go’ – the smart-ass bumper sticker from Autodesk smart-aleck John Walker, in 1990? – Now you can DIY print your own. – http://www.fourmilab.ch/evilempire/

Share/Save/Bookmark
“Afghanistan may be able to raise itself out of abject poverty”

SCREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEETCH! Uh, excuse me, no, we’ll just take that thank you very much.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Colonel Saunters's  avatarColonel Saunters · 12 minutes ago

Pentagon PR people think that Americans hope that, in time, Afghanistan may be able to raise itself out of abject poverty?
Well I’ll be a monkey’s uncle! I can’t believe USers have any such hope.

The US should have simply given the money to every Afghan woman and girl, instead of spending it on lard-ass “soldiers” and importing gasoline to Afghanistan for US use.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

U.S. Intelligence Analyst Arrested in Wikileaks Video Prob Read More http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/06/leak/#ixzz0qxfzGieh

June 16th, 2010

Federal officials have arrested an Army intelligence analyst who boasted of giving classified U.S. combat video and hundreds of thousands of classified State Department records to whistleblower site Wikileaks, Wired.com has learned.

SPC Bradley Manning, 22, of Potomac, Maryland, was stationed at Forward Operating Base Hammer, 40 miles east of Baghdad, where he was arrested nearly two weeks ago by the Army’s Criminal Investigation Division. A family member says he’s being held in custody in Kuwait, and has not been formally charged.

Manning was turned in late last month by a former computer hacker with whom he spoke online. In the course of their chats, Manning took credit for leaking a headline-making video of a helicopter attack that Wikileaks posted online in April. The video showed a deadly 2007 U.S. helicopter air strike in Baghdad that claimed the lives of several innocent civilians.

He said he also leaked three other items to Wikileaks: a separate video showing the notorious 2009 Garani air strike in Afghanistan that Wikileaks has previously acknowledged is in its possession; a classified Army document evaluating Wikileaks as a security threat, which the site posted in March; and a previously unreported breach consisting of 260,000 classified U.S. diplomatic cables that Manning described as exposing “almost criminal political back dealings.”

“Hillary Clinton, and several thousand diplomats around the world are going to have a heart attack when they wake up one morning, and find an entire repository of classified foreign policy is available, in searchable format, to the public,” Manning wrote.

Wired.com could not confirm whether Wikileaks received the supposed 260,000 classified embassy dispatches. To date, a single classified diplomatic cable has appeared on the site: Released last February, it describes a U.S. embassy meeting with the government of Iceland. E-mail and a voicemail message left for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange on Sunday were not answered by the time this article was published.

The State Department said it was not aware of the arrest or the allegedly leaked cables. The FBI was not prepared to comment when asked about Manning.

Army spokesman Gary Tallman was unaware of the investigation but said, “If you have a security clearance and wittingly or unwittingly provide classified info to anyone who doesn’t have security clearance or a need to know, you have violated security regulations and potentially the law.”

Manning’s arrest comes as Wikileaks has ratcheted up pressure against various governments over the years with embarrassing documents acquired through a global whistleblower network that is seemingly impervious to threats from adversaries. Its operations are hosted on servers in several countries, and it uses high-level encryption for its document-submission process, providing secure anonymity for its sources and a safe haven from legal repercussions for itself. Since its launch in 2006, it has never outed a source through its own actions, either voluntarily or involuntarily.

Manning came to the attention of the FBI and Army investigators after he contacted former hacker Adrian Lamo late last month over instant messenger and e-mail. Lamo had just been the subject of a Wired.com article. Very quickly in his exchange with the ex-hacker, Manning claimed to be the Wikileaks video leaker.

“If you had unprecedented access to classified networks 14 hours a day 7 days a week for 8+ months, what would you do?” Manning asked.

Bradley Manning (Facebook.com)

From the chat logs provided by Lamo, and examined by Wired.com, it appears Manning sensed a kindred spirit in the ex-hacker. He discussed personal issues that got him into trouble with his superiors and left him socially isolated, and said he had been demoted and was headed for an early discharge from the Army.

When Manning told Lamo that he leaked a quarter-million classified embassy cables, Lamo contacted the Army, and then met with Army CID investigators and the FBI at a Starbucks near his house in Carmichael, California, where he passed the agents a copy of the chat logs. At their second meeting with Lamo on May 27, FBI agents from the Oakland Field Office told the hacker that Manning had been arrested the day before in Iraq by Army CID investigators.

Lamo has contributed funds to Wikileaks in the past, and says he agonized over the decision to expose Manning — he says he’s frequently contacted by hackers who want to talk about their adventures, and he has never considered reporting anyone before. The supposed diplomatic cable leak, however, made him believe Manning’s actions were genuinely dangerous to U.S. national security.

“I wouldn’t have done this if lives weren’t in danger,” says Lamo, who discussed the details with Wired.com following Manning’s arrest. “He was in a war zone and basically trying to vacuum up as much classified information as he could, and just throwing it up into the air.”

Manning told Lamo that he enlisted in the Army in 2007 and held a Top Secret/SCI clearance, details confirmed by his friends and family members. He claimed to have been rummaging through classified military and government networks for more than a year and said that the networks contained “incredible things, awful things … that belonged in the public domain, and not on some server stored in a dark room in Washington DC.”

He first contacted Wikileaks’ Julian Assange sometime around late November last year, he claimed, after Wikileaks posted 500,000 pager messages covering a 24-hour period surrounding the September 11, 2001 terror attacks. ”I immediately recognized that they were from an NSA database, and I felt comfortable enough to come forward,” he wrote to Lamo. He said his role with Wikileaks was “a source, not quite a volunteer.”

Manning had already been sifting through the classified networks for months when he discovered the Iraq video in late 2009, he said. The video, later released by Wikileaks under the title “Collateral Murder,” shows a 2007 Army helicopter attack on a group of men, some of whom were armed, that the soldiers believed were insurgents. The attack killed two Reuters employees and an unarmed Baghdad man who stumbled on the scene afterward and tried to rescue one of the wounded by pulling him into his van. The man’s two children were in the van and suffered serious injuries in the hail of gunfire.

“At first glance it was just a bunch of guys getting shot up by a helicopter,” Manning wrote of the video. “No big deal … about two dozen more where that came from, right? But something struck me as odd with the van thing, and also the fact it was being stored in a JAG officer’s directory. So I looked into it.”

In January, while on leave in the United States, Manning visited a close friend in Boston and confessed he’d gotten his hands on unspecified sensitive information, and was weighing leaking it, according to the friend. “He wanted to do the right thing,” says 20-year-old Tyler Watkins. “That was something I think he was struggling with.”

Manning passed the video to Wikileaks in February, he told Lamo. After April 5 when the video was released and made headlines Manning contacted Watkins from Iraq asking him about the reaction in the United States.

“He would message me, Are people talking about it?… Are the media saying anything?” Watkins said. “That was one of his major concerns, that once he had done this, was it really going to make a difference?… He didn’t want to do this just to cause a stir…. He wanted people held accountable and wanted to see this didn’t happen again.”

Watkins doesn’t know what else Manning might have sent to Wikileaks. But in his chats with Lamo, Manning took credit for a number of other disclosures.

The second video he claimed to have leaked shows a May 2009 air strike near Garani village in Afghanistan that the local government says killed nearly 100 civilians, most of them children. The Pentagon released a report about the incident last year, but backed down from a plan to show video of the attack to reporters.

As described by Manning in his chats with Lamo, his purported leaking was made possible by lax security online and off.

Manning had access to two classified networks from two separate secured laptops: SIPRNET, the Secret-level network used by the Department of Defense and the State Department, and the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System which serves both agencies at the Top Secret/SCI level.

The networks, he said, were both “air gapped” from unclassified networks, but the environment at the base made it easy to smuggle data out.

“I would come in with music on a CD-RW labeled with something like ‘Lady Gaga,’ erase the music then write a compressed split file,” he wrote. “No one suspected a thing and, odds are, they never will.”

“[I] listened and lip-synced to Lady Gaga’s ‘Telephone’ while exfiltrating possibly the largest data spillage in American history,” he added later. ”Weak servers, weak logging, weak physical security, weak counter-intelligence, inattentive signal analysis … a perfect storm.”

Manning told Lamo that the Garani video was left accessible in a directory on a U.S. Central Command server, centcom.smil.mil, by officers who investigated the incident. The video, he said, was an encrypted AES-256 ZIP file.

Manning’s aunt, with whom he lived in the United States, had heard nothing about his arrest when first contacted by Wired.com last week; Debra Van Alstyne said she last saw Manning during his leave in January and they had discussed his plans to enroll in college when his four-year stint in the Army was set to end in October 2011. She described him as smart and seemingly untroubled, with a natural talent for computers and a keen interest in global politics.

She said she became worried about her nephew recently after he disappeared from contact. Then Manning finally called Van Alstyne collect on Saturday. He told her that he was okay, but that he couldn’t discuss what was going on, Van Alstyne said. He then gave her his Facebook password and asked her to post a message on his behalf.

The message reads: “Some of you may have heard that I have been arrested for disclosure of classified information to unauthorized persons. See CollateralMurder.com.”

Ex-hacker Adrian Lamo (Ariel Zambelich/Wired.com)

An Army defense attorney then phoned Van Alstyne on Sunday and said Manning is being held in protective custody in Kuwait. “He hasn’t seen the case file, but he does understand that it does have to do with that Collateral Murder video,” Van Alstyne said.

Manning’s father said Sunday that he’s shocked by his son’s arrest.

“I was in the military for five years,” said Brian Manning, of Oklahoma. “I had a Secret clearance, and I never divulged any information in 30 years since I got out about what I did. And Brad has always been very, very tight at adhering to the rules. Even talking to him after boot camp and stuff, he kept everything so close that he didn’t open up to anything.”

His son, he added, is “a good kid. Never been in trouble. Never been on
drugs, alcohol, nothing.”

Lamo says he felt he had no choice but to turn in Manning, but that he’s now concerned about the soldier’s status and well-being. The FBI hasn’t told Lamo what charges Manning may face, if any.

The agents did tell Lamo that he may be asked to testify against Manning. The Bureau was particularly interested in information that Manning gave Lamo about an apparently-sensitive military cybersecurity matter, Lamo said.

That seemed to be the least interesting information to Manning, however. What seemed to excite him most in his chats was his supposed leaking of the embassy cables. He anticipated returning to the states after his early discharge, and watching from the sidelines as his action bared the secret history of U.S. diplomacy around the world.

“Everywhere there’s a U.S. post, there’s a diplomatic scandal that will be revealed,” Manning wrote. “It’s open diplomacy. World-wide anarchy in CSV format. It’s Climategate with a global scope, and breathtaking depth. It’s beautiful, and horrifying.”

Update: The Defense Department issued a statement Monday morning confirming Manning’s arrest and his detention in Kuwait for allegedly leaking classified information.

“United States Division-Center is currently conducting a joint investigation” says the statement, which notes that Manning is deployed with 2nd Brigade 10th Mountain Division in Baghdad. “The results of the investigation will be released upon completion of the investigation.”

  • Digg
  • Stumble Upon
  • <script type=”text/javascript” src=”http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/!js/12309-102818-14594-0?mpt=2480200&mpvc=http://ad.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh%3Dv8/39ba/3/0/%2a/a%3B224569563%3B0-0%3B0%3B16638913%3B4307-300/250%3B36798913/36816791/1%3B%3B%7Eaopt%3D3/1/5b/0%3B%7Esscs%3D%3f”> </script> <noscript> <a href=”http://ad.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh%3Dv8/39ba/3/0/%2a/a%3B224569563%3B0-0%3B0%3B16638913%3B4307-300/250%3B36798913/36816791/1%3B%3B%7Eaopt%3D3/1/5b/0%3B%7Esscs%3D%3fhttp://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/nc/12309-102818-14594-0?mpt=2480200″> <img src=”http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/nb/12309-102818-14594-0?mpt=2480200″ alt=”Click Here” border=”0″> </a> </noscript>

    Read More http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/06/leak/#ixzz0qxg6C2gj

Al Mossada, Israeli Commandos Execute American Citizen see Video

June 11th, 2010

sraeli soldiers allegedly killing Furkan Dogan 19 years

See also: American, 19, Among Gaza Flotilla Dead: Furkan Dogan Was Shot Five Times, Including Four Times in Head

Posted June 09, 2010

EXCLUSIVE: New Video Smuggled Out from Mavi Marmara of Israel’s Deadly Assault on Gaza Aid Flotilla

By Democracy Now!

In a Democracy Now! exclusive, we bring you a sneak preview of previously unseen raw footage from the Mavi Marmara that will be formally released at a press conference at the United Nations later in the day. The footage shows the mood and the activities onboard the Mavi Marmara in the time leading up to the attack, and the immediate reaction of the passengers during the attack. We are joined by filmmaker and activist Iara Lee, one of the few Americans on the Mavi Marmara ship. Her equipment was confiscated, but she managed to smuggle out an hour’s worth of footage.

Buzz ItShare

Close

Forgot password?

Send me my password!

Close message

Login

Subscribe to this blog post’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS  Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Follow the discussion

Comments (19)

Loading... Logging you in…
CloseLogin to IntenseDebate

Or create an account

Close WordPress.com

CloseLogin with your OpenID

Or create an account using OpenID


  • Logged in as

Admin Options

Save Settings

Loading comments…

You are about to flag this comment as being inappropriate. Please explain why you are flagging this comment in the text box below and submit your report. The blog admin will be notified. Thank you for your input.

He was asking for it, you ask Netanyahu, he’ll tell you. His soldiers were defending themselves in the only way they know how. They find a helpless victim, brutalise them and them to cap it off they kill them with a bullet to the head. It’s the Israeli way. What’s wrong with that? They do it to women and children so a n,n,n,n,nineteen year old is an easy murder for them to commit, sorry did I say murder, I meant defend themselves from. Some of those Palestinian babies in Gaza can be pretty scary and Israeli soldiers have no choice but to defend themselves.

There is a great deal of talk about what crack soldiers the IDF are. Where they get that reputation from is a mystery given that the only fighting they have done is with unarmed men, women and children. The IDF are very good a shooting fish in a barrel like the cowards they are. It would be interesting to see how well they would fare with an equally well armed soldier that has actually fought other well trained soldiers with guns and everything. They would be crying for their mothers like the mothers boys they are. IDF your cowards and murderers of women and children but go on telling yourself you are doing a good and brave job for Israel. Kill some more unarmed civilians and feel good about yourself for being such a hero. You are scum.

Share/Save/Bookmark

1 reply · active 12 hours ago

To: All,

The video released by IDF proved that the Israeli Commando boarded the Aid Ships with Paint Guns..!

This American Teenagers & the other civilians were Terrorists that died of collective heart attack..!

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Whether this video is of Furkan or not, the truly terrifying fact is that the IDF would shoot/execute anyone on the ground who is not posing any threat. I’m one of those self-hating Jews who lost a grandparent in the Holocaust, but finds IDF and Israeli Government behaviour disgusting, immoral, illegal and reprehensible.

Share/Save/Bookmark

2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

‘IT WAS A POLICY DECISION’

The deliberate Neocon / Zionist choice that millions of Iraqis and Afghans would die for US / Israeli policy reasons — murdered, tortured, death-squaded, by war, genocide, and by starvation. The murder of 1400 civilians in the Warsaw ghetto? ER, Gaza Concentration Camp. The difference from WW2 SS Nazi Heydrich? Absolutely none.

“It was a policy decision.” Right. Tell it to the judge. The Nuremberg judge.

Netanyahu? Lieberman? Holbrooke? Wolfowitz? Or every d@mn Zionist, Neocon and his dog??? – WW2 – Heydrich – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rV25qUZcZt8#t=01m5…

HANG THE BUGGERS

Give the Neocons and Zionists what the Nazis got. Give all of them what the Nazis got. Give them the rope. To encourage the others. Just like these lovely chaps. – Nuremberg Executions of Nazi Leaders for ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ and ‘Crimes Against the Laws of War’ – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSJcXPCxlzI

But give Netanyahu and Lieberman some of their own torture first – “You lucky, lucky bastard”. – Monty Python – Life of Brian – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TPQ0DEVaEk#t=0m40…

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

tarazan's avatartarazan · 9 hours ago

If we buy Israel’s notion that taking over peaceful flotilla by force in international waters, killing people on board,arrest the rest , confiscate what they have, and take the ship to Israeli ports is considered a ‘self – defence’ act ,then all criminals and thugs in this whole world will be out of prisons and walking free today.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Benjamin Yahoo's  avatarBenjamin Yahoo · 7 hours ago

Ashdod is in Palestine. Unfortunately European apartheid colonists took control of the port. The invaders will be leaving soon.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Obama Shark's  avatarObama Shark · 7 hours ago

Mr President, do you know of any country in the Middle East that has murdered a US citizen?
and
Mr President, do you know of any country in the Middle East that has nuclear weapons?
Be honest.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

arthurdecco's  avatararthurdecco · 7 hours ago

Psychopathic, murderous scum right from the lowest of the low footsoldiers to the highest office-holders in the land.

This video suggests Israel more closely resembles a 19th century insane asylum overrun by racist, homicidal lunatics than it does a modern democratic state.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

With the same excuses, now the american border patrol is showing were they get the skills in the business of “security”.
Victimyzing the one with the gun and the murded, a young kid of 14, depicted as a “security theat”
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0609/official-mexico-…

Wake up from the isr… haze or you are doom!!

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Vox Populai's  avatarVox Populai · 5 hours ago

It’s pathetic that the only two “friends” Great Britain and Israel, that the USA has are the same rabid animals that they are. All three specialize in the wholesale murder of populations of innocent men, women and children that are unable to protect themselves. You never see these three cowardly nations facing off with the real world threats like Communist China.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Post a new comment

Or post a video comment

Go back and post a text comment

TwitterConnected as (Logout)


Not displayed publicly.

Displayed next to your comments.

Not displayed publicly.

If you have a website, link to it here.


Comment as a Guest or login using OpenID

Posting anonymously.

The Real Threat Aboard the Freedom Flotilla

By Noam Chomsky

June 08, 2010 “In These Times” – -Israel’s violent attack on the Freedom Flotilla carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza shocked the world.

Hijacking boats in international waters and killing passengers is, of course, a serious crime.

But the crime is nothing new. For decades, Israel has been hijacking boats between Cyprus and Lebanon and killing or kidnapping passengers, sometimes holding them hostage in Israeli prisons.

Israel assumes that it can commit such crimes with impunity because the United States tolerates them and Europe generally follows the U.S.’s lead.

As the editors of The Guardian rightly observed on June 1, “If an armed group of Somali pirates had yesterday boarded six vessels on the high seas, killing at least 10 passengers and injuring many more, a NATO task force would today be heading for the Somali coast.” In this case, the NATO treaty obligates its members to come to the aid of a fellow NATO country—Turkey—attacked on the high seas.

Israel’s pretext for the attack was that the Freedom Flotilla was bringing materials that Hamas could use for bunkers to fire rockets into Israel.

The pretext isn’t credible. Israel can easily end the threat of rockets by peaceful means.

The background is important. Hamas was designated a major terrorist threat when it won a free election in January 2006. The U.S. and Israel sharply escalated their punishment of Palestinians, now for the crime of voting the wrong way.

The siege of Gaza, including a naval blockade, was a result. The siege intensified sharply in June 2007 after a civil war left Hamas in control of the territory.

What is commonly described as a Hamas military coup was in fact incited by the U.S. and Israel, in a crude attempt to overturn the elections that had brought Hamas to power.

That has been public knowledge at least since April 2008, when David Rose reported in Vanity Fair that George W. Bush, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and her deputy, Elliott Abrams, “backed an armed force under Fatah strongman Muhammad Dahlan, touching off a bloody civil war in Gaza and leaving Hamas stronger than ever.”

Hamas terror included launching rockets into nearby Israeli towns—criminal, without a doubt, though only a minute fraction of routine U.S.-Israeli crimes in Gaza.

In June 2008, Israel and Hamas reached a cease-fire agreement. The Israeli government formally acknowledges that until Israel broke the agreement on Nov. 4 of that year, invading Gaza and killing half a dozen Hamas activists, Hamas did not fire a single rocket.

Hamas offered to renew the cease-fire. The Israeli cabinet considered the offer and rejected it, preferring to launch its murderous invasion of Gaza on Dec.27.

Like other states, Israel has the right of self-defense. But did Israel have the right to use force in Gaza in the name of self-defense? International law, including the U.N. Charter, is unambiguous: A nation has such a right only if it has exhausted peaceful means. In this case such means were not even tried, although—or perhaps because—there was every reason to suppose that they would succeed.

Thus the invasion was sheer criminal aggression, and the same is true of Israel’s resorting to force against the flotilla.

The siege is savage, designed to keep the caged animals barely alive so as to fend off international protest, but hardly more than that. It is the latest stage of longstanding Israeli plans, backed by the U.S., to separate Gaza from the West Bank.

The Israeli journalist Amira Hass, a leading specialist on Gaza, outlines the history of the process of separation: “The restrictions on Palestinian movement that Israel introduced in January 1991 reversed a process that had been initiated in June 1967.

“Back then, and for the first time since 1948, a large portion of the Palestinian people again lived in the open territory of a single country — to be sure, one that was occupied, but was nevertheless whole. …”

Hass concludes: “The total separation of the Gaza Strip from the West Bank is one of the greatest achievements of Israeli politics, whose overarching objective is to prevent a solution based on international decisions and understandings and instead dictate an arrangement based on Israel’s military superiority.”

The Freedom Flotilla defied that policy and so it must be crushed.

A framework for settling the Arab-Israeli conflict has existed since 1976, when the regional Arab States introduced a Security Council resolution calling for a two-state settlement on the international border, including all the security guarantees of U.N. Resolution 242, adopted after the June War in 1967.

The essential principles are supported by virtually the entire world, including the Arab League, the Organization of Islamic States (including Iran) and relevant non-state actors, including Hamas.

But the U.S. and Israel have led the rejection of such a settlement for three decades, with one crucial and highly informative exception. In President Bill Clinton’s last month in office, January 2001, he initiated Israeli-Palestinian negotiations in Taba, Egypt, that almost reached an agreement, participants announced, before Israel terminated the negotiations.

Today, the cruel legacy of a failed peace lives on.

International law cannot be enforced against powerful states, except by their own citizens. That is always a difficult task, particularly when articulate opinion declares crime to be legitimate, either explicitly or by tacit adoption of a criminal framework—which is more insidious, because it renders the crimes invisible.

Buzz ItShare

Close

Forgot password?

Send me my password!

Close message

Login

Subscribe to this blog post’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS  Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Follow the discussion

Comments (64)

Loading... Logging you in…
CloseLogin to IntenseDebate

Or create an account

Close WordPress.com

CloseLogin with your OpenID

Or create an account using OpenID


  • Logged in as

Admin Options

Save Settings

Loading comments…

You are about to flag this comment as being inappropriate. Please explain why you are flagging this comment in the text box below and submit your report. The blog admin will be notified. Thank you for your input.

Bemused's avatarBemused · 23 hours ago

Insightful again Noam. And once again Israel gets away with terrorism, murder and spin.

Share/Save/Bookmark

1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago

So true, every word Chomsky writes!
I really wonder how long Israel can continue to commit crime after crime. I doubt it can go on for ever. But then, it was for the same reason they once got kicked off the place. The insane zeal to steal other peoples’ land.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

kenllow's avatarkenllow · 22 hours ago

Until the United States stands up for justice for the Palestinians, and stops agreeing totally with seemingly, any action Israel takes, there is little hope for Gaza or for Palestine. Why does this country fear Israel so much at the expense of her neighbors??

Share/Save/Bookmark

1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago

Only until Noam accepts the role of Israel lobby in influencing special relation of US-Israel, which he still does not acknowledge, he be stand the test of time.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Simon Bar Sinister's avatarSimon Bar Sinister · 22 hours ago

N.C. is correct here. He’s stating the obvious because he has no choice if he wants to maintain his credibility.

He is, however, a part of the ever growing controlled opposition.
http://www.google.no/#hl=no&&sa=X&ei=…

Speaking of controlled opposition. Here is something I bet you didn’t know:

Hamas is a Mossad creation. It was created because it’s the most efficient way to controll the opposition: Divide and conquer. Don’t believe me?

Read this:
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=9963

Still don’t believe me? Take a look at this:
http://c4.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/7/l_b…

Share/Save/Bookmark

8 replies · active 3 hours ago

Bombs away's avatarBombs away · 22 hours ago

Yesterday was the anniversary of the Israeli terrorist attack against the USS Liberty on international waters, wherein 34 of her crew were killed and 174 wounded.

Share/Save/Bookmark

3 replies · active 18 minutes ago

joebanana's avatarjoebanana · 22 hours ago

Lets not forget that the USA is the most powerful terrorist group ever. And, the most evil, the deadliest, the most destructive, the least caring, and the most widespread. Although our military know Israel’s Mossad was responsible for 911, and the sinking of the USS Liberty, in international waters. The US government are a bunch of sissies. Criminal sissies.

Share/Save/Bookmark

3 replies · active 3 hours ago

sandgroper's avatarsandgroper · 22 hours ago

Yesterday I read that 49% of Americans believe that Israel was justified in its actions against the Flotilla. What does it take to get these ignorant brainwashed people to recognise basic human rights. Lately I’ve been hoping to read more bad news about USA going down the financial tube. Hopefully when US is broke it won’t be able to bully smaller nations

Share/Save/Bookmark

4 replies · active 3 hours ago

Callum McLaren's avatarCallum McLaren · 22 hours ago

As always Naom’s insights are spot on. We need but will neve rhave any open dialogue for AIPAC et al will always scream “anti-semitism”, blame the victims, and threaten/bully those in office with the voting blocs and money they control to influence elections. If the is a Freedom Flotila’ organsized and setting sail form our shores here, it would end the blockade or force Israel into a greater blunder, for then it woudl be too obvious to be shunted aside with the same propoganda as this latest one has been. Note not one voice has been raised re the execution of an American citizen aboard ship!!! Of course he doesn’t count his parents are Turkish and his living there for most of his life means he is to be treated as all other Americans who are not white and God believing as a good christian should be….. Appealing to your Churches who preach humanity and organize such a Flotilla. I volunter my time, and will glaldy sail upon such forthwith. Who else will sail with me if such an opportunity arises???
pax

Share/Save/Bookmark

3 replies · active 19 hours ago

But i wonder wheather noam wld call for one state solution and the ROR? Or is he once again coming on as a very just fella and then declare once again he supports the land robbery and is against ROR?

No, folks, a ‘jew’ never gives up his/her jewishness. Even gilad atzmon, who differs much from any ‘jew’ i know of regarding israel crimes, has admitted a yr ago or so that he has to fight the jewishness in him.

In this piece he offers nothing that we sharp observers don’t know. He supports war criminals; thus, is self a war criminal.
An occupied people have the right to target civilians who now live in palestinian homes.
Hamas is not guilt of war crimes, but solely the people who are stealing their land and homes.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Our Enemies, the Israelis, Al Mossada

June 8th, 2010

When will we wake up to the threat?

By Justin Raimondo

June 07, 2010 “Antiwar” –  One of my readers, in the comments section below, wrote the following in response to my last column on Israel’s hijacking of the Gaza flotilla:

“Again I ask the question: What do the Israelis have on our politicians that makes them such whores? Dirty pictures? Threats of withholding campaign contributions? It’s really embarrassing as well as infuriating to see congress with its collective pants down around their legislative ankles just waiting for Israel to do it again.”

Not that there’s anything wrong with that …

Well, actually, there is a lot wrong with that, but, in any case, what’s the answer to this question? Again and again Israel has outraged the world, and even many of its most dedicated supporters, by its actions: multiple invasions of Lebanon, “incursions” into Gaza and the West Bank, the ever-expanding settlements, the vicious racism and tribalism that characterizes the present ultra-rightist government of Benjamin Netanyahu, which includes the openly racist and fascist party of the thuggish Avigdor Lieberman – the list of Israel’s sins is a long one, and that’s going back but a few years.

Even when the Israelis blew up a US Navy ship, the USS Liberty, a military reconnaissance vessel that was monitoring Israeli troops movements prior to the Six Day War, Washington went along – in public – with Tel Aviv’s fairy tale claiming it was an “accident.” This disgrace is repeated, today, as the beaten and battered Americans who lived to tell the tale of what happened aboard the flotilla return to bear witness to Israeli brutality. An American citizen is killed, and Washington looks the other way. The ghost of Rachel Corrie is not surprised. Nor am I. Because the Israelis, after all, are our enemies.

Forget the fact that without aid from the US the Israeli settler colony would sink like a stone. Ignore the ritualistic paeans to the “special relationship,” regularly mouthed by politicians in both countries who know their lines by heart. And pay no attention to the propaganda that regularly depicts US-Israeli relations as a mutual admiration society founded on “shared values” and the love of liberal democracy.

Established in the wake of the Holocaust, and created by survivors of that horrific orgy of mass murder, the basis of Israel’s founding was and is the idea that Jews are not safe in this world. Not anywhere: no, not even in the United States. The premise behind this view is that everyone is a potential enemy, to be kept at arm’s length, at best, and to be crushed underfoot, at worst.

The lawlessness and brutality that we saw in the attack on the flotilla is inherent in the nature of Zionism, which, after all, came to birth at a time when the world was rife with nationalism of the most virulent sort. Liberal friends of Israel look on in horror as the Jewish state evolves into a combination of South Africa under apartheid and the new North Korea. Yet ideology has its own inexorable logic: it’s hardly an anomaly that the early followers of Ze’ev Jabotinsky, the leading figure in what is today the ruling party in Israel, were attracted to and full of praise for the “blood and iron” doctrine of Mussolini – and the feeling was mutual. Not for nothing did Il Duce allow Jabotinsky’s “revisionist” faction to set up a training camp in Italy for its naval fighters in the Irgun, the forerunner of today’s IDF.

We’re shocked when survivors of the flotilla attack testify to what happened, and the autopsy reports are coming in: one shot four times in the head, others shot and killed at very close range, execution-style. Yet Israel has shown what it is capable of many times: the hijacking of the Gaza flotilla was just the most recent occurrence in a string of incidents stretching back years: the kidnapping of Mordecai Vanunu, the assassination squads that roam the world in search of Israel’s enemies, the bombing of Western diplomatic and cultural facilities in Egypt to make it look as though the Arabs were responsible (the Lavon incident), not to mention the long history of Israeli aggression against its neighbors and its indigenous Arab population.

These are not the actions of a Western liberal democracy, but of a frenetic and fanatic regime that resembles nothing so much as the legendary Order of Assassins, the 12th century adherents of the Nizari Ismaili Shiite sect whose leaders sent out their murderous minions to dispose of enemies with such deadly effectiveness that their name became synonymous with violent death. Netanyahu is the modern day Old Man of the Mountain.

This role increasingly puts the Israelis at odds with their chief benefactors, the US government, and the political elites of Western Europe. While generally kept under wraps, this mutual antipathy has been on the increase, lately, as the Israelis drop their “Western” mask. The result has been a series of confrontations: the Israeli insistence on building new settlements in defiance of an American-sponsored peace plan, the ambushing of an American Vice President as he visited the Jewish state, the very real hatred for President Obama exhibited by the growing far-right in Israeli politics, and a series of high-profile attempts to penetrate America’s security firewall. To say nothing of the Israeli “art students” who flooded the US in the months prior to 9/11, and the post-9/11 revelation by Fox News – hardly the American al-Jazeera – that, as Carl Cameron put it:

“Since September 11, more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or detained, either under the new patriot anti-terrorism law, or for immigration violations. A handful of active Israeli military were among those detained, according to investigators, who say some of the detainees also failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United States.

“There is no indication that the Israelis were involved in the 9-11 attacks, but investigators suspect that the Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance, and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are ‘tie-ins.’ But when asked for details, he flatly refused to describe them, saying, ‘evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It’s classified information.’”

If the Israelis are capable of this – standing pat while information they held could have prevented the worst terrorist attack in American history – then they’re capable of anything. And the US government knows it, which is one good reason why we don’t dare cross them, at least openly, unless it can’t be avoided. They can kill Americans, steal our biggest secrets, and laugh in our faces without fear of retaliation – because we’ve nurtured a Frankenstein monster that is perfectly capable of turning on its creator, and doing considerable damage in the process.

Another good reason why we literally let them get away with murder is their political power in this country: the soft underbelly of America’s defenses against foreign incursions is the ability of foreign-backed lobbyists to undermine – and shape – US policy. A long and dedicated state-sponsored campaign to embed their agents of influence at the center of American political and social life has paid off quite handsomely. On the left as well as the right, their partisans tirelessly promote the Israeli government line – and don’t hesitate to rebuke their own political leaders whenever they show signs of straying from the narrow path of righteousness.

And who can blame them? After all, their physical existence, as well as their political independence as a nation-state, depends wholly on the lifeline of American subsidies (a little detail fake “libertarian” Rand Paul seems to have left out of his statement on Israel.)

The martial spirit that infuses Israel’s myrmidons with such passion is born of a sense of embattled isolation pulsing at the heart of the Zionist project. Surrounded by enemies, perpetually in “existential” danger, the Jewish state exists simultaneously as a consummate bully and a helpless victim: thus the odd argument coming out of Tel Aviv that their commandos were brutalized by those nasty, stick-wielding Turkish “terrorists,” who had the temerity to fight back. The Israelis released a video, which dominated the Western media coverage, of those awful Turkish “terrorists” beating commandos, omitting what happened in the moments before – live fire coming from helicopters – and after (nine execution-style deaths, and many injuries.)

To the hard line Israeli nationalist – a disagreeable species firmly in control of the government in Tel Aviv, now and for the foreseeable future – everyone is an enemy, but especially the Americans, who, to be sure, hold the fate of the Jewish state in their unreliable hands. What if, some day, we elect a President with some balls, one unafraid of the Lobby and willing to stand up for America? What if we elect a Congress that isn’t nearly as eager as this one is to kowtow to AIPAC and apologize for Israeli state terrorism? What if, one day, the aid spigot is turned off?

Israel’s national paranoia is not limited to the Israelis, per se, but also afflicts their American amen corner to such an extent that every criticism of Israel is portrayed as an anti-Semitic plot. For example, the above-cited Fox News story is never disputed, or even quoted: it is simply dismissed as vile “anti-Semitism.” Is Carl Cameron – a Fox News reporter once considered friendly to the Bush White House – an anti-Semite? Is Fox News “anti-Israel”? And what about the rest of Cameron’s fascinating and detailed four-part report, which not only avers the Israelis were watching and aware of the 9/11 hijackers, but also exposes an extensive spy operation and systematic industrial espionage in the US?

Disguised as ill feelings toward Barack Obama, the rabid anti-Americanism on the rise in Israel may seem bizarre, on the surface: why hate your best friend? Yet this development is perfectly understandable. How would you like it if your “best friend” supported you, protected you, succored you, and gave you everything you needed and wanted, so that eventually you were lost in his all-encompassing embrace? At some point, if you had any kind of character, you’d come to resent it – and even hate it, whilst hating yourself for allowing it.

The “special relationship” is a poisonous and deeply dysfunctional relationship, which benefits one party at the growing expense of the other. Sooner or later it will end, but how? With an open break, perhaps even a violent conflict – remember how Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen refused to rule out shooting down an Israeli jet crossing Iraqi airspace en route to Iran? Or, more probably, with a covert Israeli action of some sinister sort? In any event, you can be sure that Washington greatly fears the answer to that question.

Justin Raimondo is the editorial director of Antiwar.com. He is the author of An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard (Prometheus Books, 2000), Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement (ISI, 2008), and Into the Bosnian Quagmire: The Case Against U.S. Intervention in the Balkans (1996).He is a contributing editor for The American Conservative, a senior fellow at the Randolph Bourne Institute, and an adjunct scholar with the Ludwig von Mises Institute. He writes frequently for Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture.

Buzz ItShare

Close

Forgot password?

Send me my password!

Close message

Login

Subscribe to this blog post’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS  Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Follow the discussion

Comments (8)

Loading... Logging you in…
CloseLogin to IntenseDebate

Or create an account

Close WordPress.com

CloseLogin with your OpenID

Or create an account using OpenID


  • Logged in as

Admin Options

Save Settings

Loading comments…

You are about to flag this comment as being inappropriate. Please explain why you are flagging this comment in the text box below and submit your report. The blog admin will be notified. Thank you for your input.

Our Enemies, the Israelis

The title says it all!

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

peacenik's avatarpeacenik · 3 hours ago

America, you can be rid of this scourge in one fell swoop . . . investigate September 11, 2001 to ascertain who actually attacked you on that day! You are currently killing and maiming, not only innocent Afghans and Iraqis, but your own sons and daughters too! And for what? A complete and utter lie about “Al Qaida terrorists hijacking planes using box cutters and managing to evade the most defended air space in the world”! Comeon!

Unless and until you gather the guts to face up to the fact that you have been bamboozled by 911, you are headed for nowhere but hell.

Here is your starter question:

‘Is the War in Afghanistan Justified by 911?’

Check out Daivd Ray Griffin’s sober analysis here: http://blip.tv/file/3700790

Now, do domething about that!

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

peacenik's avatarpeacenik · 3 hours ago

I notice Justin Raimondo fails to mention the “dancing Israelis” who (if you grant them their ‘alibi’ such as it is) apparently knew in advance that there was going to some event worth documenting on video that morning . . . strange!

No matter. If you have never heard of that story, check it out here: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisr…

America, wake up!

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Rand paul will be great once he gets elected. He’s just like his dad. He’ll be no Israeli-asskisser. He simply has to do certain things to get elected – if that means holding back on Israel and the phony war on terror -so be it. I don’t like it, but the fact is you have to put up a front and lie if you want to get elected. Someday I hope that will not be the case.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Benjamin Disraeli, an Ashkenazim Jewish Prime Minister of Great Britain who served under Queen Victoria, fancied himself as a bit of a novelist and wrote an historical romance: The Wondrous Tale of Alroy. It was an early example of Zionist propaganda designed to get the Jews of the world longing to return to their “Promised Land” The following passage was based on the actual attempt back in the 13th century to muster a crusade of Jews to regain the Holy Land, a popular thing to do at that time given the Christians had softened up the Muslims somewhat.

“In the twelfth century there arose in Khazaria a Messianic movement, a rudimentary attempt at a Jewish crusade, aimed at the conquest of Palestine by force of arms. The initiator of the movement was a Khazar Jew, one Solomon ben Duji (or Ruhi or Roy), aided by his son Menahem and a Palestinian scribe. “They wrote letters to all the Jews, near and far, in all the lands around them.… They said that the time had come in which God would gather Israel, His people from all lands to Jerusalem, the holy city”.

The character of the Jew has changed little over the millennium and was well observed some 230 years back by none other than the famous French philosopher, Voltaire. His reply to a letter from a Jew bitterly complaining of his supposed antisemitism went as follows.:

“You seem to me to be the maddest of the lot. The Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest people than you and your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny.” “You will only find in the Jews an ignorant and barbarous people, who for a long time have joined the most sordid avarice to the most detestable superstition and to the most invincible hatred of all peoples which tolerate and enrich them.”

A further observation was prophetic to say the least:

“They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.”

They are deadly to the human race, which is us, but they see us as non humans, Goyim, beasts of burden, someone to do their bidding. Is it any wonder when America provides just that service and bows to every demand. Voltaire knew shitheads when he saw them. Bush was speaking for Israel when he said. “if you’re not with us, you’re against us” Who in their right mind could possibly identify with such dangerous morons, rejects from the Steppe of Mongolia.
Back when they were Khazar’s they were called by their fellow Jews around the known world Red Jews because of the red pigmentation in their skin from living the nomadic existence that the Mongol hoards lived. Rape, pillage and Murder was their stock in trade. They are still maintaining the family business. They are the most revolting people to have ever existed and the weird thing is they are proud of that. Stupid is what stupid does and they are fucking stupid. That’s another thing that Voltaire said by the way, I was just quoting him.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Helen Thomas comments are being used by the Israeli/American right to obscure the issues re Israel’s attack on the peace flotilla and the fact that Israel attacked the aid ship in international waters, shooting an American in the head 4 times. She made the comments on May 27 prior to the flotila attack and not as a response to the conflict…… The Israel’s apologists, including the MSM, are probably ecstatic that they can deflect that heat onto Ms.Thomas now. This demonstrates that Americans thinking that the United States has “freedom of speech” and “freedom of the press” are incorrect. “Helen Thomas is the Rosa Parks of the American press.”

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Helen Thomas made the comment almost two weeks ago??!!

And it comes to light NOW?

Israel the real Al Qaeda also known as Al Mossada ‘Israel less of an asset for US’

June 2nd, 2010

By JPOST.COM STAFF

June 01, 2010 “JPost” — Strategic ties between Jerusalem and Washington have been slowly changing since the conclusion of the Cold War, Mossad chief Meir Dagan told the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Tuesday.

“Bit by bit, Israel is becoming less of a strategic asset for America,” Dagan said in his meeting with committee.

The Mossad chief indicated as well that the US views the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a lower priority after determining that neither side is ready for an agreement.

According to Israel Radio, Dagan also surmised that the Iranian uranium fuel-swap deal brokered by Brazil and Turkey was designed to avert the sanctions proposal currently in front of the UN Security Council. Iran’s effort to avert sanctions was influenced by a lack of progress in the development of its centrifuge program the intelligence chief reported.

The Iranians “pulled a rabbit out of their hat to split the international community at the last moment,” Israel Radio quoted Dagan as saying.

IDF: Wasn’t possible to stop largest craft

By Ronen Medzini

June 01, 2010 “Ynet” — Due to impossibility of stopping Marmara, other operational options rejected, senior officer says. MK Hanegbi justifies operation, praises government. MK Eldad: Peace groups forerunners of terror groups
Ronen Medzini

A senior IDF officer said Tuesday that the army carefully considered the options for stopping the flotilla to Gaza, and rejected alternatives to the operation finally chosen which led to the killing of nine activists.

The possibility of stopping “Marmara,” the largest vessel in the flotilla, because of its size, strength and speed, was considered. But doing this by stopping its engines was rejected because the tow to the shore would be too long. There were also fears that those on the boats would be left without water or food.

The officer said that the two pistols were snatched from IDF troops and were found on the bodies of those killed. They were without bullets because they had been fired.

Meanwhile, following UN calls for a thorough investigation into the operation against the flotilla, questions are already being asked in the Knesset.

Chairman of Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Tzachi Hanegbi said Tuesday, “There are many intelligence and operational questions. We will insist on getting answers, on investigating and on learning lessons.” Mossad chief Meir Dagan was also present at the meeting.

Hanegbi justified the government and IDF decision to act against the vessels, which were making their way to the Gaza Strip to protest Israel’s blockade.

“After Operation Cast Lead, the previous government decided to impose a sea blockade on Gaza, and all goods entering the Strip via the sea would have to be checked in Ashdod first,” he said. “The opposition of that time supported the decision and the current government continued this policy, and in this spirit it was decided to prevent the inciting and violent flotilla.”

Hanegbi added that opposition party Kadima had also supported the operation. “We are not used to a consensus on many issues, but the feeling of injustice we all feel now, in light of the hypocrisy and cynicism of attacks against Israel on this issue strengthens the clear moral and security logic to prevent the opening of free sea routes into the Gaza Strip.”

The Knesset member also explained why Israel acted. “We got out of Gaza a few years ago, and since then we have been attacked, an Israeli soldier has been in some hidden basement for four years, and thus we believe we have a right to act as we acted,” he said.

He added his congratulations to decision-makers involved in the affair, including the army, the navy and the government.

MK Arieh Eldad (National Union) said to Ynet, “Maybe after this operation, with its murderous character, Israel will respond in a different manner to Bil’in and Nil’in, to all the anarchist groups for peace, and the organizations working in the name of Arab Israelis. Israel needs to understand that most of these groups are the forerunners of terror groups, promoting interests against Israel. We need to treat them as organizations who have come to kill IDF soldiers.”

During a separate event, Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz said, “We cannot expect 100% success in this kind of operation.”

In a Finance Ministry conference in Jerusalem, Steinitz said that Israel is an expert in exaggerated and dangerous self-flagellation. He said that the lifting of the sea blockade would cause further missiles and terror activities.

“Israel has no choice but to defend itself,” he declared. “The navy did all it was told, while endangering its soldiers.”

Zvi Lavi also contributed to this report

Buzz ItShare

Close

Forgot password?

Send me my password!

Close message

Login

Subscribe to this blog post’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS  Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Follow the discussion

Comments (2)

Loading... Logging you in…
CloseLogin to IntenseDebate

Or create an account

Close WordPress.com

CloseLogin with your OpenID

Or create an account using OpenID


  • Logged in as

Admin Options

Save Settings

Loading comments…

You are about to flag this comment as being inappropriate. Please explain why you are flagging this comment in the text box below and submit your report. The blog admin will be notified. Thank you for your input.

Mossad Chief: israel Gradually Becoming Burden on U.S.

The terrorist state of israel has always been a burden on the US.

israel is a cancer on the US that will eventually destroy it. Too bad Americans are too stupid to see the obvious!

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

Greg Schofield's  avatarGreg Schofield · 21 minutes ago

ALH you have got back-to-front, the Mossad Chief knows what he is talking about. Israel was America’s attack dog in the middle-east, a launch pad for co-operative operations, its super-belligerent mini-colony.

The attack dog has delusions of grandeur.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

No one knows fascism better than Israelis.

May 21st, 2010

By Bradley Burston

May 20, 2010 “Haaretz” — SHEIKH JARRAH, East Jerusalem – No one knows fascism better than Israelis. They are schooled, drilled in the history, the mechanics, the horrendous potential of fascist regimes. Israelis know fascism when they see it. In others.

They might well have expected when fascism began taking root here, it would arise at a time of a national leadership of galvanizing charisma and sweeping, powerfully orchestrated modes of action.

But that would have been much too obvious to deny. And it would take denial, inertia, selective memory, a sense that things – bad as they are – can go on like this indefinitely, for fascism to be able gain its foothold in a country founded in its very blood trail.

In fact, it has taken the most dysfunctional, the most rudderless government Israel has ever known, to make moderates uncomfortably aware of the countless but largely cosmetized ways in which the right in Israel and its supporters abroad have come to plant and nurture the seeds of fascism.

Wrote Boaz Okun, the mass-circulation Yedioth Ahronot’s legal affairs commentator and a retired Israeli judge, of Israel’s ban on Noam Chomsky: “The decision to shut up Professor Chomsky is a decision to shut down freedom in the state of Israel.

“I’m not speaking of the stupidity of supplying ammunition to those who claim that Israel is fascist,” Okun wrote, “rather, of our fear that we may actually be turning that way.”

At the weekend, Israeli police riot troops waded into a thoroughly non-violent sit-in near the entrance to this East Jerusalem settlement zone, where Palestinian residents were expelled by Israeli court order, to allow their homes to be taken over by Jews.

What was curious here was not the neck-wrenching brutality of the Yasam riot police in their gunmetal gray uniforms, bristling with assault rifles, clubs, tear gas and helmets, arrayed against the demonstrators, most of of them Israeli Jews, some of them well past retirement age.

What was surprising was not the fact that several burly officers, seeing a young Reshet Bet (Israel State Radio news) reporter – his microphone clearly and unmistakably marked, interview one of the seated demonstrators – jump him and drag him away in a headlock to a police custody van.

In the end, what was peculiar was that the police seemed so entirely bewildered, so completely lacking in clear orders, left on their own to decide how to proceed in an arena of hair-trigger sensitivity. Fascism with a confused face.

Why should we be concerned by any of this? Perhaps because we have made our peace with a number of factors that can turn a society toward fascism as a solution.

1. Losing a War.

We’ve lost two in the space of less than three years. Our targets, Hezbollah and Hamas, are better armed and entrenched than ever. Our strategic and diplomatic standing is in decline. Iran and Syria are ascendant. And there is abundant reason to suspect that the Gaza War, a major factor in the loss of our international standing, may have been altogether avoidable, the huge civilian death toll indefensible and unconscionable. This has, in turn, led to

2. International quarantine, a sense of being scapegoated, and a search for an internal fifth column.

3. A radical redefinition of positive values.

Look no further than the name of Jerusalem’s obscene Museum of Tolerance project.

4. Olfactory fatigue

We have grown desensitized to the consequences of actively denying basic staples and construction supplies to 1.5 million people in Gaza, many of them still waiting to rebuild homes we destroyed.

We have grown inured to the appropriation of Palestinian-owned West Bank land, to abusive treatment of law-abiding Palestinians at checkpoints, to the ill-treatment and summary expulsion of foreign workers, to racist, anti-democratic and, yes, fascistic rulings by extreme rightist rabbis, especially some of those holding official positions in the West Bank.

5. Fascism by rubber stamp.

“There are a million reasons why someone would be denied entry into Israel,” Interior Ministry spokeswoman Sabine Hadad said Monday, when asked about the ministry’s border policies in the wake of the Chomsky ban.

“There may be a million reasons, but try to find a single criterion for entry refusal and you’ll hit a blank wall,” said Association for Civil Rights in Israel attorney Oded Feller. “The Interior Ministry simply doesn’t publish them, despite a court ruling that ordered them to do so.”

6. The sense that despite everything, all is well.

There will be those who argue that the fact that I, or my Haaretz colleagues, are allowed to publish what we do, is proof that there is no fascism here, nor evidence of a police state.

The fact is that were we not Israeli Jews, and part of an establishment institution, any of us could find ourselves tossed out on the same pavement, and with the same lack of due process and due explanation, as Noam Chomsky.

7. The sense that there is a war on now, when there isn’t.

8. Selective enforcement of court rulings. Routine defiance of same, in particular by radical settlers

9. The 180-degree untruth that officials allow Israeli and Jerusalem Arabs to do what they want, while cracking down on their Jewish neighbors.

10. Equating criticism of the government with favoring the destruction of Israel.

This has become increasingly felt beyond Israel’s borders. In San Francisco, the canary in the coal mine of free discourse within the Jewish community, the Jewish Federation [JCF] recently revised and tightened the terms under which it agrees to grant funds to organizations.

“The JCF does not fund organizations that through their mission, activities or partnerships … advocate for, or endorse, undermining the legitimacy of Israel as a secure independent, democratic Jewish state, including through participation in the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, in whole or in part.”

The guidelines go on to state that “Presentations by organizations or individuals that are critical of particular Israeli government policies but are supportive of Israel’s right to exist as a secure independent Jewish democratic state” are “generally in accord with the policy statement,” but “early JCRC [Jewish Community Relations Council] consultation is strongly encouraged and the programming should be presented within an overall program strategy that is consistent with JCF’s core values.”

Can all this have spread this far, this fast? Because of Israel, have Bay Area Jews who do not believe in a specifically Jewish state, now forfeited their right to be part of the Jewish community? Have Jews who love Israel but are seen as too critical, or who support a boycott to make their criticisms manifest, been effectively excommunicated?

It’s a free country, I guess.

Buzz ItShare

Close

Forgot password?

Send me my password!

Close message

Login

Subscribe to this blog post’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog’s comments through…

  • Add to netvibes
  • Subscribe in NewsGator  Online
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Feedblitz
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • Add to Google
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to  Microsoft Live

RSS  Icon RSS Feed

Subscribe via email

Subscribe

Follow the discussion

Comments (3)

Loading... Logging you in…
CloseLogin to IntenseDebate

Or create an account

Close WordPress.com

CloseLogin with your OpenID

Or create an account using OpenID


  • Logged in as

Admin Options

Save Settings

Loading comments…

You are about to flag this comment as being inappropriate. Please explain why you are flagging this comment in the text box below and submit your report. The blog admin will be notified. Thank you for your input.

To become a better country they can start by having the Mossad admit they did 911.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

They are already living in hell,right here,right now on earth,there is no “special place in hell”,it is right here.Their hearts are locked in behind their “gun-metal grey uniforms,bristling with assault rifles,tear gas and helmets”,get this crap off your body,un-lock your heart and soul and discover your real purpose in life….inner peace,world peace,simple.

Share/Save/Bookmark

0 replies · active less than 1 minute ago

they’re already there

Share/Save/Bookmark